<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Checks: The Most Dangerous Transaction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/</link>
	<description>Building Security in a Networked World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:00:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-355</guid>
		<description>Just to relate my own recent experience:  I dropped a check in the mail (at an official blue US mailbox in fact) - a large check of $8000 to pay off a car loan.  All of a sudden, I started to see large withdrawls out of my checking account to places I had never heard of before.  Obviously, I went to the bank right away and they were very good about closing my account and restoring the lost money.  It took perhaps ten days or so.  The sum of the missing money (done in a couple of transactions to different accounts) was nearly exactly equal to the amount of the large check I had written, which had never been received by the bank that had the car loan.
The guy who works at the bank heard a rumor that the mailbox I mailed the check at was vandalized and mail was taken.  
So, yes, checks are scary things!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to relate my own recent experience:  I dropped a check in the mail (at an official blue US mailbox in fact) &#8211; a large check of $8000 to pay off a car loan.  All of a sudden, I started to see large withdrawls out of my checking account to places I had never heard of before.  Obviously, I went to the bank right away and they were very good about closing my account and restoring the lost money.  It took perhaps ten days or so.  The sum of the missing money (done in a couple of transactions to different accounts) was nearly exactly equal to the amount of the large check I had written, which had never been received by the bank that had the car loan.<br />
The guy who works at the bank heard a rumor that the mailbox I mailed the check at was vandalized and mail was taken.<br />
So, yes, checks are scary things!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Bugher</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Bugher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-354</guid>
		<description>Kenneth,

Essentially, they just print out a check with your routing &amp; account numbers on it, print &quot;Signature on file&quot; for the signature line, and give it to their bank.  The bank then has your bank debit your account and put the money into theirs.  These days it&#039;s usually done electronically rather than by &quot;printing&quot; anything.  

Since I originally made this post, it&#039;s gotten a &lt;em&gt;little&lt;/em&gt; harder, as the bank issuing the draft is now liable for fraud, rather than the bank paying it.  You still have the fundamental problem that the money is already gone and you have to get it &lt;em&gt;back&lt;/em&gt;, but at least banks are putting more effort into preventing the fraud as they&#039;ve started to lose their own money to it.  There&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/other/ddraft.shtm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;statement from the FTC here&lt;/a&gt; that tells a bit more about how it works.

It&#039;s a fraud that requires some setup time -- i.e. you need to set up a fake business, get some bank accounts, process some legitimate drafts, and then commit the fraud.  You can&#039;t (anymore!) just go to a web site, enter somebody&#039;s account number, and take all the money out.  Checking account numbers are, however, still much riskier to give out than credit card numbers, and it&#039;s still a much bigger pain to get the money back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kenneth,</p>
<p>Essentially, they just print out a check with your routing &#038; account numbers on it, print &#8220;Signature on file&#8221; for the signature line, and give it to their bank.  The bank then has your bank debit your account and put the money into theirs.  These days it&#8217;s usually done electronically rather than by &#8220;printing&#8221; anything.  </p>
<p>Since I originally made this post, it&#8217;s gotten a <em>little</em> harder, as the bank issuing the draft is now liable for fraud, rather than the bank paying it.  You still have the fundamental problem that the money is already gone and you have to get it <em>back</em>, but at least banks are putting more effort into preventing the fraud as they&#8217;ve started to lose their own money to it.  There&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/other/ddraft.shtm" rel="nofollow">statement from the FTC here</a> that tells a bit more about how it works.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a fraud that requires some setup time &#8212; i.e. you need to set up a fake business, get some bank accounts, process some legitimate drafts, and then commit the fraud.  You can&#8217;t (anymore!) just go to a web site, enter somebody&#8217;s account number, and take all the money out.  Checking account numbers are, however, still much riskier to give out than credit card numbers, and it&#8217;s still a much bigger pain to get the money back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenneth</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>i dont really get this, how can someone remove money from my account with just the routing number and account number...its making me nervous because ihave given no less than six people this info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont really get this, how can someone remove money from my account with just the routing number and account number&#8230;its making me nervous because ihave given no less than six people this info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-329</guid>
		<description>I am 62 years old and have used checks since I was 18 years old. 
I never had a problem. 
I don&#039;t use credit cards and don&#039;t want any. I simply do not trust any credit card issurer. 
I had a debit card until recently when there was fraudulant activity on my account, in spite of how careful I was using it. 
The bank said they would send me a new debit card which I said I don&#039;t want. 
I will only use an ATM card now so I can get some money out of my account. 
I do agree with your last tip to keep as little as possible in
your account. 
I&#039;ll keep cash on hand in spite of people  telling me it is dangerous. 
I have never had my purse stolen, but I sure have had thieves invade my bank account using my debit card !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am 62 years old and have used checks since I was 18 years old.<br />
I never had a problem.<br />
I don&#8217;t use credit cards and don&#8217;t want any. I simply do not trust any credit card issurer.<br />
I had a debit card until recently when there was fraudulant activity on my account, in spite of how careful I was using it.<br />
The bank said they would send me a new debit card which I said I don&#8217;t want.<br />
I will only use an ATM card now so I can get some money out of my account.<br />
I do agree with your last tip to keep as little as possible in<br />
your account.<br />
I&#8217;ll keep cash on hand in spite of people  telling me it is dangerous.<br />
I have never had my purse stolen, but I sure have had thieves invade my bank account using my debit card !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Excellent writeup, but I wanted to make two corrections which further enforce your argument. It&#039;s actually a 60 day window, not 30, to report fraudulent charges. And if you still have your card (only the number was compromised) you have no liability at all. The usually-waived $50 liability is for physically stolen cards. 

Source: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/credit/cre04.shtm

Using a credit card online is incredibly safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent writeup, but I wanted to make two corrections which further enforce your argument. It&#8217;s actually a 60 day window, not 30, to report fraudulent charges. And if you still have your card (only the number was compromised) you have no liability at all. The usually-waived $50 liability is for physically stolen cards. </p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/credit/cre04.shtm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/credit/cre04.shtm</a></p>
<p>Using a credit card online is incredibly safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Smith</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-289</guid>
		<description>As far back as 1989 some neighborhood teenagers stole A batch of checks out of my mailbox then one of them got a fake I.D. and went around to stores claiming
he was my son, fortunately a got a call from a store early on so I was able to call the bank and they started checking the signatures before any of them where 
paid. Normally even back then they didn&#039;t verify  signatures for most checks. 
     Back 1984 I had an elderly relative that had $7000 transferred from her checking account (forged signature on a letter requesting transfer of 70% of the account balance) to a a bank offshore. The bank reimbursed her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far back as 1989 some neighborhood teenagers stole A batch of checks out of my mailbox then one of them got a fake I.D. and went around to stores claiming<br />
he was my son, fortunately a got a call from a store early on so I was able to call the bank and they started checking the signatures before any of them where<br />
paid. Normally even back then they didn&#8217;t verify  signatures for most checks.<br />
     Back 1984 I had an elderly relative that had $7000 transferred from her checking account (forged signature on a letter requesting transfer of 70% of the account balance) to a a bank offshore. The bank reimbursed her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Godse</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Godse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Wow! I didn&#039;t realize that cheques were so dangerous. Thanks for the heads-up on the various risks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! I didn&#8217;t realize that cheques were so dangerous. Thanks for the heads-up on the various risks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>@Walter

I beg to differ. They may not be able to be washed as well as back in the day, but they can still certainly be washed. Back in 2000-2002 I worked as a teller and service manager for Wells Fargo. We would get washed checks all the time. Some we&#039;d catch, others not--and we&#039;d find out about them in our fraud reports. And since most tellers are really just kids in their first or second jobs who don&#039;t have much experience, it wasn&#039;t difficult to fool some of them when cashing--they just wouldn&#039;t notice the fade, especially on a Friday with a high check cashing volume from non-bank holders cashing &quot;on-us&quot; checks. But when we did notice the fade, we&#039;d call the cops. I had at least 2 arrests made during my stint at the bank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Walter</p>
<p>I beg to differ. They may not be able to be washed as well as back in the day, but they can still certainly be washed. Back in 2000-2002 I worked as a teller and service manager for Wells Fargo. We would get washed checks all the time. Some we&#8217;d catch, others not&#8211;and we&#8217;d find out about them in our fraud reports. And since most tellers are really just kids in their first or second jobs who don&#8217;t have much experience, it wasn&#8217;t difficult to fool some of them when cashing&#8211;they just wouldn&#8217;t notice the fade, especially on a Friday with a high check cashing volume from non-bank holders cashing &#8220;on-us&#8221; checks. But when we did notice the fade, we&#8217;d call the cops. I had at least 2 arrests made during my stint at the bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. C</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Having owned and managed the largest check recovery firm in America I must report that the instance of merchants and professional practices receiving fradulant checks is minimal compared to debit/credit cards and the merchants can virtually make taking checks as safe as accepting cash, with the added advantage of creating a paper trail. The costs, both to the merchants, and the user of cards are HUGE compared to checks. The risk of a &#039;bad person&#039; stealing your card (which often times leaves your sight at resturants,etc) is infintenitly more likely than having your check book stolen. The most important plus is that it&#039;s harder to go into debt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having owned and managed the largest check recovery firm in America I must report that the instance of merchants and professional practices receiving fradulant checks is minimal compared to debit/credit cards and the merchants can virtually make taking checks as safe as accepting cash, with the added advantage of creating a paper trail. The costs, both to the merchants, and the user of cards are HUGE compared to checks. The risk of a &#8216;bad person&#8217; stealing your card (which often times leaves your sight at resturants,etc) is infintenitly more likely than having your check book stolen. The most important plus is that it&#8217;s harder to go into debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 09:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>I think the bank mails checks to any person who is not in their system I agreed with  Hackers stealing credit card information online often steal entire databases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the bank mails checks to any person who is not in their system I agreed with  Hackers stealing credit card information online often steal entire databases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Reason</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>All of those things you claim can be done with paper checks are largely fiction.

Checks can&#039;t be &quot;washed&quot; since 1960&#039;s.  Try it some time.  All of them have chemical protection against this sort of thing.

Even large corporate checks are printed on tamper proof paper.  Try washing those some time.  The larger the corporation the more tightly controlled the check stock, and the higher the quality.  Even el-cheapo Quicken checks have enough protection to defeat washing and lifting.

Lifting laser printing is also fiction.  You can&#039;t really do this and not have it immediately detectable to the naked eye. 

Physical reproduction with high quality copiers is a greater risk.  Some of these are good enough to reproduce currency.  But all of those that ARE good enough embed identifying information into every printed image.

Mountain. Mole-Hill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of those things you claim can be done with paper checks are largely fiction.</p>
<p>Checks can&#8217;t be &#8220;washed&#8221; since 1960&#8217;s.  Try it some time.  All of them have chemical protection against this sort of thing.</p>
<p>Even large corporate checks are printed on tamper proof paper.  Try washing those some time.  The larger the corporation the more tightly controlled the check stock, and the higher the quality.  Even el-cheapo Quicken checks have enough protection to defeat washing and lifting.</p>
<p>Lifting laser printing is also fiction.  You can&#8217;t really do this and not have it immediately detectable to the naked eye. </p>
<p>Physical reproduction with high quality copiers is a greater risk.  Some of these are good enough to reproduce currency.  But all of those that ARE good enough embed identifying information into every printed image.</p>
<p>Mountain. Mole-Hill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Bugher</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Bugher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Dave: The problem with things like signature verification is that you don&#039;t actually need a physical signature to issue a demand draft.  In addition, only the bank has the signature on file to verify (I could sign any scribble on a check and have a merchant take it), and even they only check it if they have cause to think it&#039;s suspicious.

I can&#039;t really speak to the security of noca.com, since they state that they &quot;undertake an appropriate level of identity verification&quot; but don&#039;t actually say what that is.  That&#039;s where the security, if any, would need to come from -- the whole problem with checks as a payment system is the fact that demand drafts normally come with &lt;I&gt;no&lt;/I&gt; identity verification.

While credit cards have their issues (high transaction fees, etc.), they&#039;re still amazingly secure from the customer&#039;s perspective due to the fact that you can contest charges &lt;I&gt;before&lt;/I&gt; the money&#039;s gone.  Checks and debit cards don&#039;t offer that luxury -- instead, you have to try to get the money &lt;I&gt;back&lt;/I&gt;.

Alfonzo: There are a variety of ways.  One is to just use a demand-draft system that doesn&#039;t require identity verification -- qchex.com used to let anyone do this online, but they seem to have shut down after the FTC sued them for enabling millions of dollars in fraud.  There may still be similar systems on the Net in other countries.  Lacking a public system, someone with a merchant account at a bank could do it, too (they&#039;d just need to go to the trouble of setting up a fake merchant account, which obviously would require some effort since banks &lt;I&gt;do&lt;/I&gt; verify the identity of their account holders.)  

Alternately, a thief could simply order checks online with your routing number and account number, then buy stuff with them.  The checks are &quot;real&quot;, so electronic verification systems will pass them, and they&#039;ll get processed and the money sent.  Of course, you can dispute the transactions later, and the signatures probably won&#039;t match, so you&#039;ll eventually win your case and get your money back from the bank.  However, you&#039;ll still have had to go through the hassle of doing it -- probably with an empty checking account all the while -- and the thief will already have gotten away with whatever he bought with the check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave: The problem with things like signature verification is that you don&#8217;t actually need a physical signature to issue a demand draft.  In addition, only the bank has the signature on file to verify (I could sign any scribble on a check and have a merchant take it), and even they only check it if they have cause to think it&#8217;s suspicious.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t really speak to the security of noca.com, since they state that they &#8220;undertake an appropriate level of identity verification&#8221; but don&#8217;t actually say what that is.  That&#8217;s where the security, if any, would need to come from &#8212; the whole problem with checks as a payment system is the fact that demand drafts normally come with <i>no</i> identity verification.</p>
<p>While credit cards have their issues (high transaction fees, etc.), they&#8217;re still amazingly secure from the customer&#8217;s perspective due to the fact that you can contest charges <i>before</i> the money&#8217;s gone.  Checks and debit cards don&#8217;t offer that luxury &#8212; instead, you have to try to get the money <i>back</i>.</p>
<p>Alfonzo: There are a variety of ways.  One is to just use a demand-draft system that doesn&#8217;t require identity verification &#8212; qchex.com used to let anyone do this online, but they seem to have shut down after the FTC sued them for enabling millions of dollars in fraud.  There may still be similar systems on the Net in other countries.  Lacking a public system, someone with a merchant account at a bank could do it, too (they&#8217;d just need to go to the trouble of setting up a fake merchant account, which obviously would require some effort since banks <i>do</i> verify the identity of their account holders.)  </p>
<p>Alternately, a thief could simply order checks online with your routing number and account number, then buy stuff with them.  The checks are &#8220;real&#8221;, so electronic verification systems will pass them, and they&#8217;ll get processed and the money sent.  Of course, you can dispute the transactions later, and the signatures probably won&#8217;t match, so you&#8217;ll eventually win your case and get your money back from the bank.  However, you&#8217;ll still have had to go through the hassle of doing it &#8212; probably with an empty checking account all the while &#8212; and the thief will already have gotten away with whatever he bought with the check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfonzo</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfonzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-176</guid>
		<description>How does giving someone your routing number and checking account number allow them to transfer money from my account to someone else&#039;s???  I&#039;ve done this plenty of times when required by someone to wire transfer money into my account.

Thanks,

Alfonzo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does giving someone your routing number and checking account number allow them to transfer money from my account to someone else&#8217;s???  I&#8217;ve done this plenty of times when required by someone to wire transfer money into my account.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Alfonzo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Checking alternatives are worse and the threat matrix is misleading.  The con may order checks, but those get mailed to the account holder&#039;s address.  Chemical forgery can&#039;t forge human signatures.  New &quot;know your customer&quot; laws have taken hold as well.  Not sure about demand drafts, but pretty sure you can call your bank to turn them off for any account.

PayPal isn&#039;t legally defined and regulated as a bank.  So they make up their own rules.  Google the gripe sites.  At least banks have consumer protection laws.

Credit card firms charge 3%+ on every transaction which in this electronic age should cost a penny.  And recently got Congress to rewrite bankruptcy law for them.  Cards have no legal interest limits.  We the taxpayers bail out their crazy derivatives bubbles.  Waves of mass customer list thefts recently popped in the news - 50 million cusomter records here, 30 million there.

Cancelled checks constitute proof of purchase.  Cash doesn&#039;t give that.

Consider a startup noca.com run by ex-VISA employees -
&quot;Noca is building a system that will use verification on both sides to prevent fraud. The reason fraud in checks (using the ACH network ) is only 2% of the credit card fraud is because cashing a check requires two pieces of ID. Noca&#039;s payment system will be built on this underlying principle.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checking alternatives are worse and the threat matrix is misleading.  The con may order checks, but those get mailed to the account holder&#8217;s address.  Chemical forgery can&#8217;t forge human signatures.  New &#8220;know your customer&#8221; laws have taken hold as well.  Not sure about demand drafts, but pretty sure you can call your bank to turn them off for any account.</p>
<p>PayPal isn&#8217;t legally defined and regulated as a bank.  So they make up their own rules.  Google the gripe sites.  At least banks have consumer protection laws.</p>
<p>Credit card firms charge 3%+ on every transaction which in this electronic age should cost a penny.  And recently got Congress to rewrite bankruptcy law for them.  Cards have no legal interest limits.  We the taxpayers bail out their crazy derivatives bubbles.  Waves of mass customer list thefts recently popped in the news &#8211; 50 million cusomter records here, 30 million there.</p>
<p>Cancelled checks constitute proof of purchase.  Cash doesn&#8217;t give that.</p>
<p>Consider a startup noca.com run by ex-VISA employees -<br />
&#8220;Noca is building a system that will use verification on both sides to prevent fraud. The reason fraud in checks (using the ACH network ) is only 2% of the credit card fraud is because cashing a check requires two pieces of ID. Noca&#8217;s payment system will be built on this underlying principle.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Bugher</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Bugher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Yes, armed with the credit card number &amp; expiration date, someone can make charges to your credit card.  The CVV2 code makes it even easier.  They can&#039;t directly transfer money -- that&#039;s a cash advance and requires a PIN code, not just the credit card number -- though a service like PayPal might let them perform a sham transaction that transfers money to themselves.

And if you notice, I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s dangerous to buy something online -- I&#039;m saying that people worry needlessly about online transactions while blithely writing paper checks, an act far more dangerous to one&#039;s financial security.  Some ingenious hacker stealing your credit card number through electronic wizardry is far less likely than some minimum-wage employee you just handed the card to stealing it.  In the online world, people worry about hackers stealing their card numbers, but then buy things from no-name web sites and eBay sellers without worrying about the actual seller misusing the card.  And in the offline world, why don&#039;t we worry about the cashiers in the stores memorizing our card numbers and misusing them?  They could do so.  

There are risks inherent in our financial systems.  Ironically, the online transactions are often among the safest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, armed with the credit card number &#038; expiration date, someone can make charges to your credit card.  The CVV2 code makes it even easier.  They can&#8217;t directly transfer money &#8212; that&#8217;s a cash advance and requires a PIN code, not just the credit card number &#8212; though a service like PayPal might let them perform a sham transaction that transfers money to themselves.</p>
<p>And if you notice, I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s dangerous to buy something online &#8212; I&#8217;m saying that people worry needlessly about online transactions while blithely writing paper checks, an act far more dangerous to one&#8217;s financial security.  Some ingenious hacker stealing your credit card number through electronic wizardry is far less likely than some minimum-wage employee you just handed the card to stealing it.  In the online world, people worry about hackers stealing their card numbers, but then buy things from no-name web sites and eBay sellers without worrying about the actual seller misusing the card.  And in the offline world, why don&#8217;t we worry about the cashiers in the stores memorizing our card numbers and misusing them?  They could do so.  </p>
<p>There are risks inherent in our financial systems.  Ironically, the online transactions are often among the safest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-170</guid>
		<description>i am newbie to credit card actually i am a student and i want to ask that is it dangerous to show some one own credit card number or he saw the CVC number then can he transferre amount from that account to his own?
and my other request is that if you are genius and experts says that its dangerous to buy something online (because there are still some hacker who can break through into weak systems especially pirated CD&#039;S operating system then how can we keep us safe from this thing.or we should not buy anything online :D ?reply me must on my email given.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am newbie to credit card actually i am a student and i want to ask that is it dangerous to show some one own credit card number or he saw the CVC number then can he transferre amount from that account to his own?<br />
and my other request is that if you are genius and experts says that its dangerous to buy something online (because there are still some hacker who can break through into weak systems especially pirated CD&#8217;S operating system then how can we keep us safe from this thing.or we should not buy anything online <img src='http://perimetergrid.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  ?reply me must on my email given&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Longer Safe to Write Personal Checks? - Amidst a tangled web</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>No Longer Safe to Write Personal Checks? - Amidst a tangled web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>[...] Credit card fraud isn&#8217;t the only issue to be concerned about. Checks could be a dangerous transaction. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Credit card fraud isn&#8217;t the only issue to be concerned about. Checks could be a dangerous transaction. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech updates! &#171; Whitenoise</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech updates! &#171; Whitenoise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>[...] to stop giving checks to those who find errors in his publications. The decision is based on the security concerns with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to stop giving checks to those who find errors in his publications. The decision is based on the security concerns with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Week 10: thoughts on air travel &#171; Seize the Moment of Excited Curiosity for the Acquisition of Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Week 10: thoughts on air travel &#171; Seize the Moment of Excited Curiosity for the Acquisition of Knowledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>[...] are now (apparently) the most dangerous way to give someone money. Every check has both the bank routing number and your account number, and with that information a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are now (apparently) the most dangerous way to give someone money. Every check has both the bank routing number and your account number, and with that information a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Daley</title>
		<link>http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Daley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 14:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perimetergrid.com/wp/2008/01/01/checks-the-most-dangerous-transaction/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>I knew that getting money back from a checking or savings account was hard (not as hard as getting it back from paypal, but nowhere near as easy as a credit card).

BlueFonzie&#039;s question is a good one - and I&#039;d be interested in that answer as well.  We do a lot of online bill pay - I think the bank mails checks to anyone that isn&#039;t in their electronic system, so I&#039;d expect it carries the same risks.

I hadn&#039;t realized the electronic withdrawals could be done by anyone.  Why do any of us have any money in our bank accounts?  Wouldn&#039;t it be relatively easy to just take everyone&#039;s money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew that getting money back from a checking or savings account was hard (not as hard as getting it back from paypal, but nowhere near as easy as a credit card).</p>
<p>BlueFonzie&#8217;s question is a good one &#8211; and I&#8217;d be interested in that answer as well.  We do a lot of online bill pay &#8211; I think the bank mails checks to anyone that isn&#8217;t in their electronic system, so I&#8217;d expect it carries the same risks.</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t realized the electronic withdrawals could be done by anyone.  Why do any of us have any money in our bank accounts?  Wouldn&#8217;t it be relatively easy to just take everyone&#8217;s money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
